Age appropriate dating christian
Age appropriate dating christian - Adult dating in hampshire and berkshire
Twenty-eight of them (44%) fall within this time gap.
The latest illustration of not admitting the uncertainties of older dating methods until newer ones have been developed centers around a new method proposed for dating human fossils in this 40,000-to-200,000-years ago time period.Shortcomings of a dating method in current use are not generally acknowledged by evolutionists.Only when they feel they have devised a better method for a specific time period, do they publicly admit the weaknesses of the method they had been using previously.However, because of severe dating problems which are seldom mentioned, this alleged sequence cannot be maintained.To present the fossil evidence as a relatively smooth transition leading to modern humans is akin to intellectual dishonesty.Because bone is porous, it is subject to ground-water leaching.
Hence, the method fell into disfavor because it gave questionable dates.However, these alternative methods have serious problems of their own.Of the 84 anatomically modern Homo sapiens fossil individuals dated by evolutionists beyond 40,000 years, 59 of them (70%) fall into this 40,000-to-200,000 ya gap.This problem period may be even larger because: (1) some dating authorities believe that the effective range for K-Ar doesn't begin until about 400,000 ya, and (2) many of the older fossils are found at sites that lack the volcanic rocks necessary for K-Ar dating and hence cannot be dated by this method at all.Although young-earth creationists challenge the legitimacy of all of the dates obtained by the long-term radiometric methods, even evolutionists are beginning to admit that this dating gap presents a problem for them.Anyone familiar with the paleoanthropological literature knows that this is not the way most of the dates for fossil discoveries in that time period have been presented.